Atrocities against Hinduism

These are some of the facts that have happened in and outside India.
Destruction of Hinduism seems to be the sole motive of the Christian and Muslim communities. With the present Government being headed by a Christian, all the higher officials are either converting into Christianity or losing their positions to christians.

I am not against any religion, I only say that one should not try to suppress or blackmail followers of other religions to glorify their religion

Well If you dont believe me Refer the following links

-> http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/jan/24shoba.htm
-> http://www.freeindiamedia.com/current_affairs/
21_july_current_affairs.htm
-> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/south_asia/899422.stm
-> http://in.news.yahoo.com/050116/139/2j1rp.html
-> All details about the entire Nehru Family 
->Sonia set to destroy Hinduism
-> Muslims pelt stones at Shivajayanti Procession
-> Anti-Brahmanism
->Christian Impact on Hinduism

This pdf shows more insight into this matter:

http://www.esnips.com/doc/a1275a14-6e49-4986-8ee4-56eb1d7b199a/Death-of-Hinduism

(To be continued)

A Father's Advice to his Son

This set of advices are unique and useful to anyone, anywhere in the world.

FROM HAMLET, PRINCE OF DENMARK - William Shakespeare:

Act 1 Scene 111. – A Room in Polonius’s House

Polonius.
[Laying his hands on Laertes’s head.]
And these few precepts in thy memory
See thou character. Give thy thought no tongue,
nor any unproportion’d thought his act.
Be thou familiar, but by no means vulgar
The friends thou hast, and their adoption tried,
Grapple them to thy sole with hoops of steel;
But do not dull thy palm with entertainment
Of each new-hatch’d, unfledg’d comrade.
BewareOf entrance to a quarrel; but, being in,
Bear’t that the opposed may beware of thee.
Give every man thine ear, but few thy voice:
Take each man’s censure, but reserve thy judgement
Costly thy habits as thy purse can buy,
But not express’d in fancy, rich, not gaudy:
For the apparel oft proclaims the man;
And they in France of the best rank and station
Are most select and generous chief in that.
Neither a borrower nor a lender be:
For a loan oft loses both itself and friend;
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
This above all, - to thine own self be true;
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Farewell: my blessing season this in thee!

Tejo Mahalaya or Taj Mahal???

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya). In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand 
mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of
Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. 

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.

Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani, " he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace. Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time. 

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples . Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research.

The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate. 

Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this
reality.....
Visit this link for further complete details: Taj Mahal: The true story